FOCUS LOGO
issue logo
 
Spring 2004 contents:  


Extension Takes New
Wheats for Test Drive

...
Economic Development
...
Forest Stewardship
...
Washington Forest
Facts
...
Washington Wines
...
EFNEP Honors
...
Food Processing
Industry

...
Herb Hinman
Helps Farmers

...
Alaska Salmon Fisherman
...
Crabbing Conflicts
...
Rural Telework
...
4-H Teen-Works
Program

...
Practical Entrepreneurship
...
Calm Voice in a Storm
...
Thermometer Project


Other Editions

 

  Extension Fosters Economic Development  
 

The overall theme of this issue of Extension Focus is economic development. We are highlighting work our faculty are doing that benefits the state's economy in one way or another including economics studies that helped potato producers negotiate a better contract a couple years ago; Extension's coached forestry stewardship program, which is helping small private forest landowners manage their lands better and achieve their goals; and Extension work that is helping educate workers in Washington's rapidly growing wine industry.

In this issue you will see examples of our expanded mission in our collaboration with Jerman Rose, who is director of the Center for Entrepreneurial Studies in the College of Business and Economics. On the flip side, you will see a lot of examples of things we have been doing for many years that are the strength of Extension and continue to be successful.

Last fall I told you that we were taking steps to change our organizational name to reflect our expanded mission and partnerships. The Board of Regents endorsed our request in November, so now we are known as WSU Extension instead of WSU Cooperative Extension.

Historically, most of our funding has come from a partnership of federal, state, and county governments. "Cooperative Extension" described that relationship. In recent years, however, a growing portion of our budget has come from external sources, primarily grants and contracts. That source has grown to the point where grants and contracts now equal the state's contribution to our budget.

This tells us that Extension is a really good taxpayer investment if you consider that for every state dollar we receive, we bring in an external dollar.

But, grants and contracts cannot replace state funding. State funding pays faculty salaries. Grants often require local matching funds. State-funded salaries often constitute a major portion of the matching funds we cite when writing a grant proposal. We can’t afford to get any leaner because we won’t have the physical effort to compete for grants that now fund a lot of what we do.

Welcome as external funding is, it comes with strings attached. It directs our programming. While that isn’t necessarily bad, we lose some flexibility in our ability to respond to the needs of our clientele.

 
LINDA KIRK FOX

Federal appropriations now constitute 10 to 12 percent of our budget. An equal percentage is furnished by counties. Gifts and contracts that do not fall into other categories provide close to 10 percent of our funding.

We face some budget challenges on the federal front. We have lost some funding for a number of high priority programs in the federal FY ‘04 budget which we hope to restore in FY ‘05. One of those programs is the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program, which is celebrating 35 years of service to the public this year. You will read more about that program in this issue.

EFNEP staff, drawn from low income audiences the program is trying to help, work with families to help them understand food choices, food preparation, and food safety as they apply to them. The idea is to improve health, productivity, and self-esteem through better diets.

In Washington, we have served both migrant and immigrant communities. The newest include Latino communities throughout the state and an immigrant Slavic population in Spokane.

As we move to a university-wide Extension, I want to remind people the most distinguishing characteristic of land-grant universities is Extension. I cannot overemphasize the importance of implanting the land-grant vision in those who lead our land-grant university. I contend university-wide Extension is returning to our roots as a land-grant university.

We also are reminding the public that the mission of a land-grant university differs from other public universities. What makes us different is our commitment to serve the people of the state in the communities where they live by helping them apply knowledge learned at the university and by responding to their needs.

The land-grant vision, and dedication to that vision, are worth more than any techniques or tools we use in our work. The key is not in the specific details of what we do, but the purpose to make lives better.
Linda Kirk Fox


end graphics
 
                         
                         
  graphics

Contact us: Dennis Brown 509-335-2930 | Accessibility | Copyright | Policies
CAHE Information Department, 401 Hulbert, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-6244 USA